De Novo Orthopedics
CMS TEAM Model: Mandatory Bundled Payment for 741 Hospitals — Why Remote Monitoring Is No Longer Optional
Blog/

CMS TEAM Model: Mandatory Bundled Payment for 741 Hospitals — Why Remote Monitoring Is No Longer Optional

In January 2026, CMS launched TEAM — the first mandatory bundled payment model covering joint replacement and spinal fusion. 741 US hospitals must collect PROM and manage complications within a 30-day episode, with zero infrastructure funding. What's the policy signal for orthopedics in Taiwan?

policypromirehabjoint-replacement

The Letter That Left No Way Out

In late 2025, administrators at 741 US hospitals received a notice from CMS — the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: starting January 1, 2026, their hospital would be participating in the TEAM model.

Not an invitation. Not an application. Mandatory participation.

This is the first mandatory bundled payment model in the history of American orthopedic surgery. There is no opt-out. And the requirements include something most hospitals have never done systematically: collecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) before and after surgery, at scale.

Why should orthopedic surgeons and hospital administrators in Taiwan care about a US payment system? Because CMS's policy direction has never stayed confined to the United States.

What Is TEAM?

TEAM is a mandatory, 5-year bundled payment model launched by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on January 1, 2026, running through December 31, 2030[1].

SpecificationValue
Participating hospitals741 IPPS hospitals in selected CBSAs
Participation typeMandatory (no opt-out)
Duration5 years (Jan 2026 – Dec 2030)
Covered proceduresLower extremity joint replacement (LEJR), hip/femur fracture treatment, spinal fusion, CABG, major bowel procedure
Episode windowSurgery + 30 days post-discharge
Target priceCovers Medicare Parts A + B (surgery, hospital stay, all post-discharge care within episode)
PROM requirementMandatory — ≥50% matched pre/post completion
PROM infrastructure fundingNone

In short: CMS sets a single target price covering the entire 30-day episode. If actual spending comes in under that target, the hospital shares in the savings. If it comes in over, the hospital absorbs the loss — up to a 20% stop-loss cap.

Why TEAM Is Different from BPCI-A

Hospitals familiar with CMS's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI-A) model may assume TEAM is more of the same. It is not.

FeatureBPCI-ATEAM
ParticipationVoluntaryMandatory
Episode window90 days30 days
PROM collectionNot requiredRequired (≥50% match rate)
Risk tracksSingle3 tracks (Glide Path → Standard → Advanced)
Health equity adjustmentNoYes — dual-eligible and LIS adjustments

The 30-day episode window is shorter than BPCI-A's 90 days, but the combination of mandatory participation, mandatory PROM collection, and escalating risk tracks makes TEAM the most consequential bundled payment model CMS has ever launched for surgical care[3].

The Chain Reaction That Zeroes Out Surgical Margin

This is the heart of the whole argument.

Under TEAM, hospitals own every dollar of Medicare Parts A and B spending within the 30-day episode. If total costs exceed the target price, the hospital absorbs the difference.

Now consider the reality of modern orthopedic practice: 34% of total knee replacements in the US are already same-day discharge, and that share is projected to reach 51-60% by 2026[6]. Mean length of stay for TKA has already dropped to 0.89 days.

Here is the chain reaction that follows:

  1. Patient goes home on the day of surgery or the next day — hospital has no direct monitoring capability
  2. Day 8: a wound complication develops — patient isn't sure whether it's normal
  3. Day 10: patient visits the ED — evaluation, possible readmission
  4. CMS counts the ED visit and readmission in the episode cost — not a separate billing event
  5. Episode cost exceeds the target price — hospital absorbs the difference
  6. That TKA's margin goes to zero — or negative

A single unplanned readmission can add tens of thousands of dollars to the episode cost. For a TKA where the target price is already tight, one readmission within the 30-day window can erase the entire surgical margin.

Remote patient monitoring (RPM) breaks this chain. Evidence suggests RPM can significantly reduce post-surgical readmissions[8]. In the TEAM context, RPM is not a clinical nicety — it is margin insurance.

For more on the same-day discharge trend and remote monitoring, see Same-Day Joint Replacement Is Here.

PROM: Mandatory, but Unfunded

TEAM requires hospitals to collect PROM data using KOOS, JR. (for total knee arthroplasty) and HOOS, JR. (for total hip arthroplasty), with a matched pre-operative and post-operative completion rate of at least 50%[4][5].

Here is the problem: most hospitals are nowhere near 50%.

According to the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) 2024 Annual Report, only 44% of member institutions have submitted any PROM data at all, and the one-year post-operative response rate is just 25-32%[6].

A survey of 612 AAOS members reveals why[7]:

  • 72% cite staff burden as the primary barrier
  • 69% point to patient completion challenges
  • 47% cite cost

Paper questionnaires achieve a completion rate of 9.5%. Electronic collection improves this to 53.85% — but that barely clears the 50% threshold, and only for the initial collection point[11].

CMS requires hospitals to hit that 50% threshold, but doesn't provide any funding to get there. It's a textbook unfunded mandate.

For a deep dive into PROM tools, see Why Your Surgeon Should Be Tracking PROM.

How iRehab Addresses the TEAM Challenge

iRehab is De Novo Orthopedics' platform for post-surgical remote care. In the TEAM context, it addresses two core needs at once:

PROM collection:

  • Built-in PROMIS Global-10 — sent on a regular schedule via QR code, link, or email
  • Automatic T-score calculation — physical and mental health scored separately, benchmarked against US population norms
  • Time-series tracking — surgeons see a trend line, not an isolated number
  • Built to support KOOS, JR. and HOOS, JR. collection at the time points CMS requires

Post-discharge monitoring:

  • Daily rehab-progress tracking throughout the 30-day episode window
  • Pain-score monitoring with anomaly alerts (auto-triaged on the clinician side into needs-attention / good-news)
  • Wound-photo submission for remote assessment
  • PROM scores, rehab data, and clinical alerts on a single timeline
  • Push notifications — an 8:00 a.m. exercise reminder, a 4:00 p.m. check-in reminder, and a PROM-overdue alert
  • Six rehab milestones tracked automatically as a "stamp card," which clinics can pair with a small in-person reward at follow-up
  • A one-tap rehab-completion card generated at case closure, recording VAS change and milestones reached

PROMIS CAT (computerized adaptive testing) takes just 4 questions and 45 seconds, with zero ceiling or floor effects[9]. Shorter, more frequent check-ins build the tracking habit; the full CMS-mandated instruments are still collected at the key milestones.

In the future, when Discovery R's implantable sensors generate real-time biomechanical data, objective tissue-load data will be cross-referenced against what patients report — but that's the next step. The TEAM mandate is today's problem.

The Signal for Taiwan

CMS's policy direction never stays inside the United States. The historical pattern is clear: CMS leads, and within 3-5 years, the major health systems of Europe, Australia, and Asia roll out similar quality-measurement requirements.

The UK's NHS already ties PROMs to hospital performance. Australia's ACORN registry is expanding its PROM integration.

Taiwan's National Health Insurance Administration hasn't launched a TEAM-style bundled payment model yet, but it already references CMS's quality frameworks in several areas. When the world's largest single payer makes PROM collection and bundled payment mandatory, the question isn't whether Taiwan will follow — it's whether your infrastructure will be ready.

Building your PROM collection and remote-monitoring infrastructure now isn't about scrambling to meet tomorrow's regulation. It's about already having usable data and a mature workflow in place by the time that regulation arrives.

This Is Not Optional

TEAM represents a fundamental shift in how orthopedic surgical quality is measured and paid for:

  • Participation is mandatory — 741 hospitals, no opt-out
  • PROM collection is required — not aspirational, not voluntary
  • Post-discharge costs are the hospital's problem — every readmission counts
  • Infrastructure funding is zero — CMS requires it but does not pay for it

The hospitals that will thrive under TEAM are those that treat post-surgical monitoring as core infrastructure — not an afterthought, not a compliance checkbox, but the system that protects surgical margins in a bundled payment world.

The 30-day episode window started on January 1, 2026. The clock is already running.

References

  1. CMS TEAM Model official page. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Link

  2. TEAM Frequently Asked Questions. CMS. Link

  3. New TEAM Payment Model Brings Opportunities, Challenges for Surgeons and Hospitals. ACS Bulletin. Jan 2025. Link

  4. New CMS policy mandating PROM collection for THA/TKA. 2024. PubMed

  5. AAOS resources support PROM adoption amid new CMS requirements. AAOS Now. Jan 2026. Link

  6. 2024 AJRR Annual Report Highlights. PMC

  7. Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Collection and Use Among AAOS Members. JAAOS. 2024. Link

  8. Text messaging improves PROM completion rates. 2024. PubMed

  9. Psychometric Properties and Feasibility of PROMIS CATs. JBJS. Nov 2025. Link

  10. Biopsychosocial ML models predict improvement after TKA. Scientific Reports. 2025. Link

  11. Chen KK, Feng JE, Anoushiravani AA, et al. Improved Patient Reported Outcome Collection Through Integrated Online Patient Portals. NYU Langone Health / Force Therapeutics. 2019. Link